Whisper vs AssemblyAI — Which is Better for English Transcription?
Technical comparison between OpenAI Whisper and AssemblyAI: accuracy in English, diarization, cost per minute, and advanced features. Includes real data and concrete use cases.
🎙️ Transcribe for free
Upload your audio or video and get the text in seconds.
30 minutes/month free. No credit card required.
Supported formats: MP3, WAV, OPUS, M4A, MP4, OGG
How it works
Define your priority: accuracy, speed, or cost
For maximum accuracy in clean English audio: AssemblyAI and Whisper large-v3 are equivalent (94-97%). For noisy audio: Whisper has the edge. For fast processing of long files: AssemblyAI (asynchronous, no chunking required). For local, cost-free processing: Whisper open-source.
Consider features beyond transcription
AssemblyAI includes: speaker diarization, sentiment analysis, automatic summaries, entity detection, and chapters. Whisper: text + timestamps only. If you need advanced features without manual post-processing, AssemblyAI is more comprehensive.
Calculate the real cost for your volume
AssemblyAI: $0.37/hour of audio (direct API) or 15 cycles/min on VozParaTexto. Whisper via OpenAI API: $0.006/min — cheaper, but lacks advanced features. Local Whisper: free, but requires GPU and infrastructure.
Comparison table: Whisper vs AssemblyAI
Feature | Whisper (OpenAI) | AssemblyAI | English Accuracy (clean audio) | 94-96% | 94-97% | Accuracy with noise | ⭐ Better | Good | Speaker diarization | ❌ Not native | ✅ Native | Automatic punctuation | ❌ Raw text | ✅ Full punctuation | File limit (API) | 25 MB | 5 GB | Chunking required | ✅ For >25MB | ❌ No | API Cost | $0.006/min | $0.006-0.01/min | Open-source usage | ✅ Free (local) | ❌ SaaS only | Advanced features | Text only | Summary, sentiment, entities | Processing | Synchronous | Asynchronous (polling)